My wife and I had a mini-road trip over the weekend, getting a chance to see two sets of friends. First we stayed with a friend of mine from YDS in South Carolina. We got lost on the way and didn't make it to their house until late, but it was so wonderful that it didn't matter. We stayed up and talked with them until after midnight, sharing stories and laughing and enjoying the fellowship that is rare without a set of shared experiences in the background of the present. We've stayed with them overnight once before, and it was equally wonderful. The wife put words to one of my own thoughts over breakfast the next morning: "It's really nice to have people stay with you because it's just a different way to hang out than when you just come for a little bit and are gone the next day."
Sleeping together creates intimacy. Whether it's in the same bed, under the same roof, or even under the same stars on a camping trip (which I really want to do with my youth group this summer), sleeping together and waking up together must be a kind of liminal experience. Whether it is because you enter into a new kind of trust with someone when you are willing / forced to be unconscious around them or simply because they were there in the night and are there again in the morning, you're sharing something (that I think is) extremely special. My two best friends from college are both guys that I lived with, guys whom I visited and spent the night at their house. Even my roommates that I'm not in close contact with now... I shared something with them I didn't have with other friends at college. And some of the most treasured friends of my heart are the ones I spent entire summers with on a ministry team.
I remember, actually, being secretly terrified of one of my friends that I spent two summers with on a ministry team. It became increasingly difficult for me to understand that they probably knew me better in so many fundamental ways than anyone else. She had seen me in an endless number of situations where there was no pretense in my being, when I had no chance of trying to control the way that other people interacted with me, whether that was jumping up and down in worship or crying my eyes out or playing soccer. Then we got in the same van with all those other people and kept on driving. Our friendship grew, over time, and even though we were never extremely close, but I was aware that she had insight into my identity (or at least I felt she did) that no one else shared. And I was afraid. I was still learning to trust that people actually liked me, the real me down at my core. The unconscious me.
On Trinity Sunday, a day when everyone should be preaching, teaching, and learning about perichoresis (without every using the word, for heaven's sake!), maybe my sermon would have been that the church should experiment more with road trips and slumber parties.
Sunday, May 26, 2013
Friday, May 24, 2013
Smart Phones. Dumb Questions.
I can't sleep. It's 2:30 a.m. on a school night.
I hardly think that I'm weary with the pain of Jacob's wrestling, but my mind is definitely not at peace.
I'veneeded wanted needed a new phone practically since I got the one I have now, the first Christmas after I got married. I got a refurbished phone from the dealer. From day one, it turned itself on and off repeatedly at will until I had one bar of battery left. For the first year it would only do it if I wasn't using it. Since then, it's done it whether I've been sending or reading a text, setting my alarm (usually primary function #1 of my phone), or even a couple times when I have been having a conversation on it. I should have sent it back during the warranty period, but I never did. I couldn't exercise the initiative.
My dad at Christmas noticed it and we had a conversation about me ordering a new phone, now that I've had the same phone for quite some time.
To add in some of my internal dilemma, I've said repeatedly that I don't even want a smartphone. I don't want my e-mail access 24/7. I didn't even really want a cell phone in the first place. I got one only because I was going to school so far from where my parents lived and needed a way to stay in touch with them.
So when my dad asked me the other night if I still wanted a new phone (yes, I know, Christmas was a while ago), I automatically got out on the website to see what upgrades I could get for free. I was surprised to note that there were actually more non-smartphone options than there were when I got the phone I have now. However, I noticed I could get an iPhone upgrade for free.
I more or less jumped at the chance. The only hesitation that preceded any action on my part was that we really can't afford to pay for a data plan. I called my dad and he said don't worry about it, so of course as soon as I got home I got online and had it shipped here.
But in my sleepless state, I'm having second thoughts. First of all, if I were a government and I wanted to have 1984 / Fahrenheit 451 levels of control over people, wouldn't smartphones be the best way to do it? I mean, never mind that Google is actually destroying any notion of privacy as we know it, and has been for years. The internet itself, facebook, whatever, it's all tracking our data. I was just remarking the other day that I can't imagine political smear campaigns ten years from now, when all you have to do to "dig up dirt" on someone is spend ten minutes surfing through facebook photos. Yikes.
I know, I know, it sounds a little conspiracy-ish. I can't help it.
I also wonder: is Thoreau still Thoreau if he has a smartphone?
If I have a smartphone, will I become a consumer of nature, of experience, rather than someone who merely exists? Will I I always be plugged in (like how I'm writing this lengthy rambling attempt to come to closure online instead of paper)?
The other thing bothering me is essentially this question: Am I really so desperate to conform? Do I talk a big game (saying I don't want a smartphone) to justify the fact that I can't afford to be like everyone else, but then abandon all my swagger at the first chance to join the crowd? Do I want to conform, or do I want to be different? How badly do I want to be just like everyone else, to have nice things like everyone else, to fall at the altar of Apple?
Why do I feel differently about getting an iPhone than I do about my long held plans to get an iPad this summer, or to use frequently the iPod touch I've had for a year and half? I even said to my wife that having an iPhone eliminates the need for me to get a new iPod touch, which is something she and I have both talked about. Is having a smartphone really so different than having both an iPod and a non-smartphone anyway?
Growing up in a holiness tradition, I heard NON-stop about the importance of being "set apart." God has called me to be a chosen people, a royal priesthood, a holy nation. I must and shall live a pure, set apart and holy life. Non-Chrisians should look at me and see something different and be attracted by my way of life to the God who makes me holy; that's what St. Francis's quote about preaching the gospel without using words means, duh. "Holiness, holiness is what I long for."
What is a Christian approach to living with technology? Is there a "Christian" approach to technology? Should there be? How different do I have to be? Does being different mean avoiding what everyone else is doing? Can I do what everyone else is doing and just do it differently, with a different mindset and different attitudes and different emphases? I want to make some comment about Wendell Berry here, but never having read more than two of his poems I can't. But I wish I could.
Is this a matter of faith? Is this a matter of my identity, of the way that I mark myself out as different from everyone else? Or is it the weary ramblings brought on by party-food dinner and too much end of the year stress? I'm not sure how important to let all of this be. Part of me wants to cancel the order. Part of me knows I could do that and return it at any time, especially to downgrade. Part of me is already upset with myself for being so impulsive, the same part of me that remembers a meeting with a psychologist who recommended that I be more impulsive because she could tell right away how cautious I am, who much I need to approve of what I do before I do it. Do I need more time to think about this? Would I even come to a different conclusion? Part of me can't believe I didn't talk all this out with my wife before I acted and ordered it. I feel judged by her... which says far more about me than it does her. I feel judged a lot, internally; probably because I unconsciously play the role of judge in most of my everyday life. I think that my small differences from other people make me a better person. How arrogant, how ridiculous is that?
Almighty God, to whom all hearts are open, all desires known, and from whom no secrets are hid; Cleanse the thoughts of our hearts by the inspiration of your Holy Spirit, that we may perfectly love you and worthily magnify your holy name, through Christ our Lord. Amen.
I hardly think that I'm weary with the pain of Jacob's wrestling, but my mind is definitely not at peace.
I've
My dad at Christmas noticed it and we had a conversation about me ordering a new phone, now that I've had the same phone for quite some time.
To add in some of my internal dilemma, I've said repeatedly that I don't even want a smartphone. I don't want my e-mail access 24/7. I didn't even really want a cell phone in the first place. I got one only because I was going to school so far from where my parents lived and needed a way to stay in touch with them.
So when my dad asked me the other night if I still wanted a new phone (yes, I know, Christmas was a while ago), I automatically got out on the website to see what upgrades I could get for free. I was surprised to note that there were actually more non-smartphone options than there were when I got the phone I have now. However, I noticed I could get an iPhone upgrade for free.
I more or less jumped at the chance. The only hesitation that preceded any action on my part was that we really can't afford to pay for a data plan. I called my dad and he said don't worry about it, so of course as soon as I got home I got online and had it shipped here.
But in my sleepless state, I'm having second thoughts. First of all, if I were a government and I wanted to have 1984 / Fahrenheit 451 levels of control over people, wouldn't smartphones be the best way to do it? I mean, never mind that Google is actually destroying any notion of privacy as we know it, and has been for years. The internet itself, facebook, whatever, it's all tracking our data. I was just remarking the other day that I can't imagine political smear campaigns ten years from now, when all you have to do to "dig up dirt" on someone is spend ten minutes surfing through facebook photos. Yikes.
I know, I know, it sounds a little conspiracy-ish. I can't help it.
I also wonder: is Thoreau still Thoreau if he has a smartphone?
If I have a smartphone, will I become a consumer of nature, of experience, rather than someone who merely exists? Will I I always be plugged in (like how I'm writing this lengthy rambling attempt to come to closure online instead of paper)?
The other thing bothering me is essentially this question: Am I really so desperate to conform? Do I talk a big game (saying I don't want a smartphone) to justify the fact that I can't afford to be like everyone else, but then abandon all my swagger at the first chance to join the crowd? Do I want to conform, or do I want to be different? How badly do I want to be just like everyone else, to have nice things like everyone else, to fall at the altar of Apple?
Why do I feel differently about getting an iPhone than I do about my long held plans to get an iPad this summer, or to use frequently the iPod touch I've had for a year and half? I even said to my wife that having an iPhone eliminates the need for me to get a new iPod touch, which is something she and I have both talked about. Is having a smartphone really so different than having both an iPod and a non-smartphone anyway?
Growing up in a holiness tradition, I heard NON-stop about the importance of being "set apart." God has called me to be a chosen people, a royal priesthood, a holy nation. I must and shall live a pure, set apart and holy life. Non-Chrisians should look at me and see something different and be attracted by my way of life to the God who makes me holy; that's what St. Francis's quote about preaching the gospel without using words means, duh. "Holiness, holiness is what I long for."
What is a Christian approach to living with technology? Is there a "Christian" approach to technology? Should there be? How different do I have to be? Does being different mean avoiding what everyone else is doing? Can I do what everyone else is doing and just do it differently, with a different mindset and different attitudes and different emphases? I want to make some comment about Wendell Berry here, but never having read more than two of his poems I can't. But I wish I could.
Is this a matter of faith? Is this a matter of my identity, of the way that I mark myself out as different from everyone else? Or is it the weary ramblings brought on by party-food dinner and too much end of the year stress? I'm not sure how important to let all of this be. Part of me wants to cancel the order. Part of me knows I could do that and return it at any time, especially to downgrade. Part of me is already upset with myself for being so impulsive, the same part of me that remembers a meeting with a psychologist who recommended that I be more impulsive because she could tell right away how cautious I am, who much I need to approve of what I do before I do it. Do I need more time to think about this? Would I even come to a different conclusion? Part of me can't believe I didn't talk all this out with my wife before I acted and ordered it. I feel judged by her... which says far more about me than it does her. I feel judged a lot, internally; probably because I unconsciously play the role of judge in most of my everyday life. I think that my small differences from other people make me a better person. How arrogant, how ridiculous is that?
Almighty God, to whom all hearts are open, all desires known, and from whom no secrets are hid; Cleanse the thoughts of our hearts by the inspiration of your Holy Spirit, that we may perfectly love you and worthily magnify your holy name, through Christ our Lord. Amen.
Tuesday, May 21, 2013
Cincinnatus
In CPE, I was shocked when our supervisor looked at me during a group supervision and said that I was exercising my leadership in the group. I hadn't thought about doing that, nor had it been one of my goals. I actually had trouble seeing what she meant until she (and the rest of the group) pointed out that I was the one who started daily Noonday prayer for our cohort and invited everyone to join in, I was the one who suggested that we go out for drinks after Super(vision) Tuesdays, I was the one making sure we ate lunches together. Those things seemed like common sense to me. Even deeper, I was doing those things because I wanted and needed the community support. I'm afraid of being lonely. But while I was thinking about making sure my own needs were being met, others were seeing me exercise leadership.
My friend Otis hammered away at me, over and over, that more than anything else I needed to work on my own sense of "inner authority." I got frustrated with him at the time, and still bristle a little bit thinking about it. I'd rather work behind the scenes, most of the time, on important things. I'm afraid of public failure. I'm more comfortable tweaking and adjusting other people's ideas than creating the vision. I'm happy to pursue goals that someone else has set rather than dream up my own. It happened a lot in Episcopal Evangelism Network meetings; I was often quiet for much of the meeting, while conversation and different opinions escalated and divisions threatened to slow our meetings to a halt. When anger started to appear in the room, I would simply raise my hand and wait for someone to call on me. I'm afraid, usually, of direct conflict. I'm working on it. But patiently waiting for the group to allow me to speak, waiting to make sure my own voice would be heard, others were seeing me exercise leadership.
An ancient Roman legend tells the story of Rome beset by her enemies, besieged within her own walls, facing certain defeat from the barbarian horde. And a lonely farmer, Cincinnatus, came to the head of the military and led the Roman army to victory and the city to a new peace. When he did, he eschewed power and returned to his farm.
In an effort to meet my own needs as an EC (Special Education) teacher, I'm exercising leadership again. Only this time, I recognize it. I'm putting my own personality, perspective and time into fixing a problem that has been systemic and pervasive and persistent within Teach For America: the lack of training that EC Corps Members have received before reaching the classroom. I pitched the idea to an ENC big-wig, and a friend joined up with me and we're writing out own plan for training materials. We're hoping to write our first presentation on the basics of Individualized Education Plans next week. We've sent out our ideas to other EC CMs, and they have given us great feedback and been really excited that we've initiated things.
I have to confess: I like having the control. I freaked out a little bit (internally) when a document I had created circulated without me knowing it. I got feedback as a result from people I didn't know personally, which was extremely helpful. I'm afraid that someone else could do it better than I could. Scratch that; I know there are several people who could do it much better than I could.
But I'm exercising leadership. I'm finding my own sense of inner authority, at least a little bit. And I like it.
I'm trying to hold the reins loosely, to collaborate, to welcome other voices and follow different directions. I'm making sure I'm not the only one working on this and that I have a partner at all times... which is good, because the friend I am working with is much more practical about actionable steps than I am. I need that. I'm learning about new ways of exercising leadership.
But I can't help wondering, as I enjoy this semi-public position of leadership that I know I am exercising: should I, like Cincinnatus, avoid seeking out this leadership and power? How will I know when the job that I initiated is done?
My friend Otis hammered away at me, over and over, that more than anything else I needed to work on my own sense of "inner authority." I got frustrated with him at the time, and still bristle a little bit thinking about it. I'd rather work behind the scenes, most of the time, on important things. I'm afraid of public failure. I'm more comfortable tweaking and adjusting other people's ideas than creating the vision. I'm happy to pursue goals that someone else has set rather than dream up my own. It happened a lot in Episcopal Evangelism Network meetings; I was often quiet for much of the meeting, while conversation and different opinions escalated and divisions threatened to slow our meetings to a halt. When anger started to appear in the room, I would simply raise my hand and wait for someone to call on me. I'm afraid, usually, of direct conflict. I'm working on it. But patiently waiting for the group to allow me to speak, waiting to make sure my own voice would be heard, others were seeing me exercise leadership.
An ancient Roman legend tells the story of Rome beset by her enemies, besieged within her own walls, facing certain defeat from the barbarian horde. And a lonely farmer, Cincinnatus, came to the head of the military and led the Roman army to victory and the city to a new peace. When he did, he eschewed power and returned to his farm.
In an effort to meet my own needs as an EC (Special Education) teacher, I'm exercising leadership again. Only this time, I recognize it. I'm putting my own personality, perspective and time into fixing a problem that has been systemic and pervasive and persistent within Teach For America: the lack of training that EC Corps Members have received before reaching the classroom. I pitched the idea to an ENC big-wig, and a friend joined up with me and we're writing out own plan for training materials. We're hoping to write our first presentation on the basics of Individualized Education Plans next week. We've sent out our ideas to other EC CMs, and they have given us great feedback and been really excited that we've initiated things.
I have to confess: I like having the control. I freaked out a little bit (internally) when a document I had created circulated without me knowing it. I got feedback as a result from people I didn't know personally, which was extremely helpful. I'm afraid that someone else could do it better than I could. Scratch that; I know there are several people who could do it much better than I could.
But I'm exercising leadership. I'm finding my own sense of inner authority, at least a little bit. And I like it.
I'm trying to hold the reins loosely, to collaborate, to welcome other voices and follow different directions. I'm making sure I'm not the only one working on this and that I have a partner at all times... which is good, because the friend I am working with is much more practical about actionable steps than I am. I need that. I'm learning about new ways of exercising leadership.
But I can't help wondering, as I enjoy this semi-public position of leadership that I know I am exercising: should I, like Cincinnatus, avoid seeking out this leadership and power? How will I know when the job that I initiated is done?
Monday, May 20, 2013
How fitting, to start with failure
Veni Creator Spiritus
Mentes tuorum visita.
Come mid-November, I struggle to find traction in my spiritual life. The church year leaves me high and dry, with the great festivals either tantalizingly close but not yet present or too far in the past to provide me any vitality. When we haven't reached thanksgiving yet I can't wade into Advent and prepare for Christmas... and Pentecost and Easter seem to have vanished long ago. It's been a perpetually dry season for me. Dryness is so necessary for a healthy life cycle it comes out good, in the end, but that doesn't make it any easier.
Because I'm so terribly vain, I think I could succeed in lots of different PhD programs. Probably one of my few ideas worth any merit, however, would be to do one in a field I have no real training in: ethics. I think that a book on "The Ethics of the Fruits of the Spirit" would be entirely fascinating, challenging, and wholly appealing to a broad swath of Christian traditions, if properly packaged.
"The fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control. Against such things there is no law." I suppose I really should say goodness; but I've long felt that the fruit most lacking in my life is self-control.
In this season of Pentecost (and I'm trying to think of it as the season of Pentecost, not the season after Pentecost and certainly not Ordinary Time; no wonder I'm so burnt out by the end of it. No wonder high liturgical churches suffer, in Pentecostal eyes, from a lack of the freedom of the Spirit.) my BHAG (that's big, hairy audacious goal) is this: to write every day.
Mentes tuorum visita.
Come mid-November, I struggle to find traction in my spiritual life. The church year leaves me high and dry, with the great festivals either tantalizingly close but not yet present or too far in the past to provide me any vitality. When we haven't reached thanksgiving yet I can't wade into Advent and prepare for Christmas... and Pentecost and Easter seem to have vanished long ago. It's been a perpetually dry season for me. Dryness is so necessary for a healthy life cycle it comes out good, in the end, but that doesn't make it any easier.
Because I'm so terribly vain, I think I could succeed in lots of different PhD programs. Probably one of my few ideas worth any merit, however, would be to do one in a field I have no real training in: ethics. I think that a book on "The Ethics of the Fruits of the Spirit" would be entirely fascinating, challenging, and wholly appealing to a broad swath of Christian traditions, if properly packaged.
"The fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control. Against such things there is no law." I suppose I really should say goodness; but I've long felt that the fruit most lacking in my life is self-control.
In this season of Pentecost (and I'm trying to think of it as the season of Pentecost, not the season after Pentecost and certainly not Ordinary Time; no wonder I'm so burnt out by the end of it. No wonder high liturgical churches suffer, in Pentecostal eyes, from a lack of the freedom of the Spirit.) my BHAG (that's big, hairy audacious goal) is this: to write every day.
Sunday, April 28, 2013
Hebel (or thewritingmoment)
I posted recently about wanting to be a writer. This week I've thought several times: wow, I really should sit and write that down. It would make a great blog post! I can't wait to use that idea for a sermon! And then something else grabs my attention and I move on and don't do anything with it. The moments pass so fast and I never remember them. It's like chasing after the wind. The writing moment is really just a second in my eyes. The writing impulse is the tiniest tic of a hardly-felt nerve. If I gave my body more attention I'd notice it, but I can't usually be bothered. Fleeting and vain is my affinity for writing. I need a way to capture these moments and give them some attention and effort.
What would appeal to my sensibilities is to carry around a tiny little journal, a moleskine notebook to write everything down in, the way Jamal does in Finding Forrester (one of my favorite movies since I first saw it in high school). Except for the fact that I loathe carrying things in my pockets, it would work out well.
So, I decided to try to enter the (terrifying) digital age. I created a Twitter account. Literally for this purpose: to give myself a place to instantly keep and store some of the ideas that I want to go back to and write about later. It's my writer's notebook, if you will, a list of topics I need to come back to when I have the time and intention to write about them... at least, that's the ideal. Twitter is going to be my tool; we'll see if having it increases the labor for which I'm adding it to my toolbox.
Will it work? We'll see!
If you are truly desperately bored, you can find me on the Twitterverse at @pilgrimbarefoot
What would appeal to my sensibilities is to carry around a tiny little journal, a moleskine notebook to write everything down in, the way Jamal does in Finding Forrester (one of my favorite movies since I first saw it in high school). Except for the fact that I loathe carrying things in my pockets, it would work out well.
So, I decided to try to enter the (terrifying) digital age. I created a Twitter account. Literally for this purpose: to give myself a place to instantly keep and store some of the ideas that I want to go back to and write about later. It's my writer's notebook, if you will, a list of topics I need to come back to when I have the time and intention to write about them... at least, that's the ideal. Twitter is going to be my tool; we'll see if having it increases the labor for which I'm adding it to my toolbox.
Will it work? We'll see!
If you are truly desperately bored, you can find me on the Twitterverse at @pilgrimbarefoot
Sunday, April 14, 2013
I Am a Words Person
One of the books I'm reading right now is Donald Miller's "A Million Miles in a Thousand Years." Donald Miller's writing has played a pretty important role in my life: "Blue Like Jazz" was one of the three most important books I read in college.
At the end of part three, Don is telling the story about meeting a remarkable man who writes down all his memories. He has, Don says, more than 500 pages of his own memories. As I've written here before, memory is extremely important to me, and I was really struck by the idea of writing my memories down (alongside realizing, as I scrolled through pictures recently, that memory is one of the driving forces in what makes the facebook so popular).
Reading "A Million Miles" is pushing me towards something I've known for some time but been too afraid (and too lazy) to admit, even to myself: I think I want to be a writer.
My last semester at Yale I read Oryx and Crake by Margaret Atwood. While the main themes of the story lean more towards dystopia, bioengineering and pharmaceutical corruption, one of the things that really stuck with me was when the protagonist is forced to go to a "low-level" university while his friend goes to the highest achieving school there is. The reason they are split up? Crake is a science and math genius. The protagonist is a words person.
I am a words person. I love to dwell on the resonance and symbolism of words and their meanings and their multiple meanings. Even though I knew from the start that my preaching class in seminary was taught from the perspective of a preacher who sees himself as a poet (rather than a herald or a prophet, as described in Thomas Long's book) I didn't expect my own style to emerge poetic at all (I don't know what I did expect). But when I think about my own style, I think of it as the poetic.
I wrote a lot of poetry in high school; you can find some of it out there on the internet without even trying very hard. It's probably embarrassing. But it captures my attempts at self-expression, my attempts to put emotion into words. I won't say it was ever a precise attempt, because it certainly wasn't that at all; again, I'm not seeking to hide from my own laziness at any point in thisconfession post. I couldn't even post here once a week during Lent!
This weekend at a TFA summit in Raleigh, I attended a breakout session on Social Entrepreneurship. It was fantastic. The presenters talked a lot about hard work. They talked a lot about reflection. They talked a lot about ideas. They talked a lot about possibility, potential, creativity, and even a little bit about joy. I love all those things (well, again, except maybe hard work). Even more exciting, albeit daunting, was this: Christopher Gergen, when asked how he became a social entrepreneur and why, said that for most people, their 20s are all about purposeful exploration. It's when you get to your 30s that you want to be building something. I'm still in my 20s. One of the things I know I want to purposefully explore in the next few years?
Being a writer.
At the end of part three, Don is telling the story about meeting a remarkable man who writes down all his memories. He has, Don says, more than 500 pages of his own memories. As I've written here before, memory is extremely important to me, and I was really struck by the idea of writing my memories down (alongside realizing, as I scrolled through pictures recently, that memory is one of the driving forces in what makes the facebook so popular).
Reading "A Million Miles" is pushing me towards something I've known for some time but been too afraid (and too lazy) to admit, even to myself: I think I want to be a writer.
My last semester at Yale I read Oryx and Crake by Margaret Atwood. While the main themes of the story lean more towards dystopia, bioengineering and pharmaceutical corruption, one of the things that really stuck with me was when the protagonist is forced to go to a "low-level" university while his friend goes to the highest achieving school there is. The reason they are split up? Crake is a science and math genius. The protagonist is a words person.
I am a words person. I love to dwell on the resonance and symbolism of words and their meanings and their multiple meanings. Even though I knew from the start that my preaching class in seminary was taught from the perspective of a preacher who sees himself as a poet (rather than a herald or a prophet, as described in Thomas Long's book) I didn't expect my own style to emerge poetic at all (I don't know what I did expect). But when I think about my own style, I think of it as the poetic.
I wrote a lot of poetry in high school; you can find some of it out there on the internet without even trying very hard. It's probably embarrassing. But it captures my attempts at self-expression, my attempts to put emotion into words. I won't say it was ever a precise attempt, because it certainly wasn't that at all; again, I'm not seeking to hide from my own laziness at any point in this
This weekend at a TFA summit in Raleigh, I attended a breakout session on Social Entrepreneurship. It was fantastic. The presenters talked a lot about hard work. They talked a lot about reflection. They talked a lot about ideas. They talked a lot about possibility, potential, creativity, and even a little bit about joy. I love all those things (well, again, except maybe hard work). Even more exciting, albeit daunting, was this: Christopher Gergen, when asked how he became a social entrepreneur and why, said that for most people, their 20s are all about purposeful exploration. It's when you get to your 30s that you want to be building something. I'm still in my 20s. One of the things I know I want to purposefully explore in the next few years?
Being a writer.
Thursday, April 4, 2013
To Wash the Feet of a Hurting and Embarrassed World
I was fortunate enough to be asked to preach Maundy Thursday this year at the church that is sponsoring me for ordination. Below is the text I preached from:
Jesus said: You do not
know what I am doing, but later you will understand.
And again,
You also should do as
I have done to you.
May I speak in the
name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Amen.
I’d like to tell you,
just for a minute, about my best friend Ryan.
Ryan is a very clean human being.
He is a neat-freak, a
germaphobe, an obsessive cleaner.
He wrote rules for his
housemates and put them up by the sink,
Rules for how to keep
the sponge clean.
Ryan knows that I’m
not going to wear my shoes,
But he still thinks
I’m crazy.
Ryan would never go around barefoot.
Ryan is the kind of
person who comes to Maundy Thursday and says:
No way - no how - no
chance am I taking my shoes off to have my feet washed.
Dirty. Gross.
Unsanitary. Weird. EMBARASSING.
How good of Jesus to
be honest,
As he knelt to wash
his friends’ feet:
You do not know what I am doing, but later you will
understand.
How many times did
Jesus say this that we do not have written down?
How many times should
Jesus have said this?
When the storm raged
all around that little fishing boat,
Jesus took a nap.
When the crowd of
five-thousand was half-starved and far from home,
Jesus sent the twelve
out with two pieces of fish between all of them.
When the Pharisees,
the strictest of all Jews, confronted Jesus,
He told them
straight-up that they didn’t understand the Sabbath.
When a hated
tax-collector was in the crowd,
Jesus broke
everybody’s social rules and invited himself over for dinner.
You go to the nicest house in Oxford
and try that.
When the mob was already
holding their stones, intent on righteous murder,
Jesus dropped down and
drew in the dirt.
When a voice from
heaven announced the start of his ministry,
Jesus fled / into the
desert and disappeared // for forty
days.
You do not know what I am doing, but later you will
understand.
In Bible study last
Sunday morning
Pastor John told us
that when we get baptized
We don’t have to turn
in our brains at the door.
I’m glad for
that. I’m a teacher! I’m glad for that.
But I also know
something else:
A life that follows
Jesus is going to be filled with a whole lot of confusion.
You do not understand what I am doing, Jesus said,
but later you will understand.
Peter did not
understand.
Brash, impulsive
Peter.
Peter,
Who named Jesus rabbi,
master, teacher, messiah.
All Peter could see
was Jesus,
Doing the work of a
slave.
It was a slave’s job
to deal with the feet,
The lowest slave of
the low.
Jesus took his job,
Taking sandaled feet
that trod the dusty, unpaved roads where the animals ran wild,
And washing them
clean.
{Peter did not
understand,
“Lord, not my feed only but also my hands and
my head!”
Peter did not
understand.}
For all that Maundy
Thursday is concerned with our feet,
It says a lot about
our hands as well.
Jesus knew, the gospel
says, that the Father had put ALL things into his hands.
It reminds me of that
song:
“He’s got the whole
world, in his hands…”
The Father had put all
things into Jesus hands.
ALL things.
Justice.
Dominion.
Glory.
Power.
The Kingdom.
Do you remember the
temptation?
“Now Satan took Jesus
to a high mountain.
And he showed him all
the kingdoms of the earth.
And he said to him:
And he said to him:
“All this I will give
to you,
If only you will bow
down and worship me.”
“Love the Lord your God and worship Him only”
Jesus replied.
Satan thought the
kingdom, the power, and the glory were in his hands.
But Satan does not understand power.
When Satan in his
pride grabs for power
He thinks of ruling
and of riches,
Of fury and force,
of might and of majesty,
of command and of control.
Satan grabs power to
lord it over others and force them to serve him.
The temptation Jesus
faced in the desert was a double edged attack:
Jesus dodged one
temptation by not taking the power from Satan,
By staying true to the
One True God.
The other temptation
that Jesus now overcomes
The temptation was to understand power in the way that Satan
seeks to hold it.
The battle Jesus began
with Satan in the desert begins to reach its climax here,
In the upper room at
the last supper.
The Father had given
all things into his hands.
Don’t you know that
even now the tempter was there,
The echo of his voice
whispering in Jesus’ ear:
“Take up the sword
with a mighty hand and oustretched arm,
Attack your enemies,
force the Romans out of Jerusalem,
Set up a kingdom of
great power and glory
Put all the nations
under your feet!”
In that moment,
When Jesus had all
things in his hands,
He did not stretch out
a mighty arm,
But he knelt and took
up stinking, filthy feet.
Jesus understands
power.
Power is to be used
for the sake of love.
“He loved them to the end,” one translation
says,
Or in another “He
showed them the full extent of his love.”
He took off his outer
robe,
Tied a towel around
his waist,
Knelt before them to
do the work of a slave,
And used his hands to
wash their feet.
And he said to them:
“You also should do as I have
done to you.”
What has Jesus done
With his
hands?
He has done the work
of the lowest of the low.
He has ensured that
they are clean in their body and their spirit.
He has anointed the
feet of his friends
That he knows will flee from his suffering.
That he knows will flee from his suffering.
I was with my friend
Ryan one Maundy Thursday.
The bulletin for that
service told us that we were free to have our hands washed
instead of our feet.
And Ryan, germaphobe
that he is,
Instantly said “no way
am I taking off my shoes.”
I peer pressured him,
Embarrassed him into
doing what everyone else was doing.
I understand that many
of you may feel now as Ryan did that night.
No way am I taking off
my shoes.
Dirty. Gross.
Unsanitary. Weird. EMBARASSING.
I know you may not
believe it,
But even I know how
hard it can be to accept having your feet washed.
I know it can be truly
humiliating to take off your shoes
And allow someone to
go so low as to wash off your feet.
One of the most
humiliating experiences of my life was having my feet washed.
I was out in the grass
playing soccer with my friends,
And of course, I was
barefoot.
We played for hours in
the mud and the grass.
At one point, a friend
kicked me with her shoes on and cut open my foot.
It wasn’t that
painful, so of course I kept playing!
But when I went to
return to pick up my backpack from a classroom,
I passed by a friend
of mine.
She was shocked at the
sight of my feet,
Bruised and dirty and
still slightly bleeding.
She forced me into a
bathroom – a women’s bathroom! –
And made me sit on the
sink so that she could wash off my feet.
I was just like Peter:
No! Stop!
You don’t have to do
this!
I’m not worth this
kind of love.
Friends, the lesson
from 1 Corinthians is clear:
We must be humble as we
come to this altar to receive,
To discern the body
and blood of the Lord.
We must proclaim the
Lord’s death until he comes.
Friends, we are used
to coming to this altar.
But tonight, we are
invited to come forward not once, but twice.
One time will seem
familiar.
We come to kneel at
this altar,
To receive communion.
But when we do that
tonight,
It will be after the
first time we come,
When we come to we
have our feet washed.
We come to receive
communion
After we have been
humbled,
Embarassed, and even
humiliated,
After we have come to
realize
We do not deserve this
kind of love.
This is no empty
religious ritual.
We are coming forward
to meet the hands that hold the whole world in place.
The hands into which
the Father has given everything.
The hands that truly
understand that
Having power means to
love.
That having everything
means being invited to serve.
That the true kingdom
and power of God is NOT of this world,
But calls us to die to
this world.
To come to the altar
unsure, confused, and even embarrassed.
Calls us NOT to
understand,
But to stretch out our
own hands,
Weak, empty and frail,
And to hear the words:
The body of Christ,
the bread of heaven.
The blood of Christ,
the cup of salvation.
Then we will be called
to get up, on our feet, and to go out
To love and serve the
Lord with gladness and singleness of heart,
To do to others as has
been done unto us.
To be the hands of
Jesus,
Seeking not our own
power,
But filled with love,
To go out into a world
that is confused, broken, hurting and embarrassed,
And to wash its feet.
Amen.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)